ThomasJeffersonSpeaks

Locke, Newton & Bacon: Jefferson's favorite thinkers

2007-07-27T00:34:00.000-07:00

Religious Toleration (John Locke's civil society)

2007-07-26T23:01:00.000-07:00

Some historical background on John Locke, a devout Christian who proposed the separation of church and state, can be found here:

http://plato.stanford.edu/en
tries/locke/#LocRelTol

Locke's Letter on Religious Toleration can be read at http://www.constitution.org/jl/tolerati.htm

A very informative article on Deism and the Founders, published in the Virginia Quarterly Review, can be read online at

http://www.vqronline.org/articles/2003/autumn/holmes-religion-james-monroe/

On Infidels and Priests

2007-07-25T23:12:00.000-07:00

I have ever thought religion a concern purely between our God and our consciences, for which we were accountable to him, and not to the priests. I never told my own religion, nor scrutinized that of another. I never attempted to make a convert, nor wished to change another's creed. I have ever judged of the religion of others by their lives ... for it is in our lives, and not from our words, that our religion must be read. But this does not satisfy the priesthood. They must have a positive, a declared assent to all their interested absurdities. My opinion is that there would never have been an infidel, if there had never been a priest.

Letter to Mrs. Samuel Smith, August 6, 1816

Morality is Instinctual

2007-07-25T22:45:00.001-07:00

Some have made the love of God the foundation of morality ... If we did a good act merely from the love of God, and a belief that is pleasing to Him, whence arises the morality of the Atheist? ... In protestant countries, the defections from the platonic Christianity of the priests is to Deism, in catholic countries they are to Atheism. Diderot, D'Alembert, D'Holbach, Condorcet [philosophers & atheists], are known to have been among the most virtuous of men. Their virtue, then, must have had some other foundation than love of God.
...
Nature hath implanted in our breasts a love of others, a sense of duty to them, a moral instinct. ... I sincerely, then, agree with you in the general existence of a moral instinct. I think it the brightest gem with which the human character is studded.

Letter to Thomas Law, June 13, 1814

On Jesus

2007-07-24T21:57:00.000-07:00

The truth is that the greatest enemies to the doctrines of Jesus are those calling themselves the expositors of them, who have perverted them for the structure of a system of fancy absolutely incomprehensible, and without any foundation in his genuine words [Jefferson's chief example of this is Calvin].

And the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter. But we may hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away with all this artificial scaffolding, and restore to us the primitive and genuine doctrines of this the most venerated reformer of human errors.

Letter to John Adams, April 11, 1823

Presbyterianism

2007-07-24T20:57:00.000-07:00

The atmosphere of our country is charged with a theatening cloud of fanaticism...I had no idea, however, that in Pennsylvania, the cradle of toleration and freedom of religion, it could have risen to the height you describe. This must be owing to the growth of Presbyterianism. The blasphemy and absurdity of the five points of Calvin, and the impossibility of defending them, render their advocates impatient of reasoning, irritable, and prone to denunciation.
...
In our village of Charlottesville, there is a good degree of religion, with a small spice only of fanaticism. We have four sects [Episcopalian, Methodist, Baptist, and Presbyterian]...and all mix in society with perfect harmony. It is not so in the districts where Presbyterianism prevails undividedly. Their ambition and tyranny would tolerate no rival if they had power. Systematical in grasping at an ascendancy over all other sects, they aim, like the Jesuits, at engrossing the education of the country, are hostile to every institution which they do not direct, and jealous at seeing others begin to attend at all to that object.

Letter to Dr. Cooper, Nov. 2, 1822

The Improvement of the Human Mind

2007-07-24T18:34:00.000-07:00

The Gothic idea that we are to look backwards instead of forwards for the improvement of the human mind, and to recur to the annals of our ancestors for what is most perfect in government, in religion and in learning, is worthy of those bigots in religion & government, by whom it has been recommended, & whose purposes it would answer. But it is not an idea which this country will endure.

Letter to Joseph Priestly, January 27, 1800

2007-07-24T18:28:00.000-07:00

Bigotry in Politics & Religion

2007-07-24T16:44:00.000-07:00

What an effort, my dear Sir, of bigotry in Politics & Religion have we gone through! The barbarians really flattered themselves that they should be able to bring back the times of power & priestcraft. All advances in sciences were proscribed as innovations. They pretended to praise and encourage education, but it was to be the education of our ancestors. We were to look backwards, not forwards. for improvement.

Letter to Joseph Priestly, March 21, 1801

The Dictates of Reason

2007-07-24T16:30:00.000-07:00

Everyone must act according to the dictates of his own reason, and mine tells me that civil powers alone have been given to the President of the U.S. and no authority to direct the religious exercises of his constituents.

Letter to Rev. Samuel Miller, January 23, 1808

Our Civil Rights and Religious Opinions

2007-07-24T15:51:00.000-07:00

Our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions, any more than our opinions in physics and geometry; that therefore the proscribing any citizen as unworthy [of] the public confidence by laying upon him an incapacity of being called to offices of trust and emolument, unless he profess or renounce this or that religious opinion, is depriving him injudiciously of those privileges and advantages to which, in common with his fellow citizens, he has a natural right; that it tends to corrupt the principles of that very religion it is meant to encourage, by bribing, with a monopoly of worldly honors and emoluments, those who will externally profess and conform to it; ...that the opinions of men are not the object of civil government, nor under its jurisdiction; that to suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency is a dangerous fallacy, which at once destroys all religious liberty, because he being the judge of that tendency will make his opinions the rule of judgment, and approve or condemn the sentiments of others only as they square with or differ from his own own; that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order.

A Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom (excerpts) 1777